Messiah's Unfulfilled and Fulfilled Prophecies

Question from Quora:

Since even the Christians agree that Jesus did not fulfill most of the Old Testament prophecies about the Messiah, then why should anyone accept Jesus as the Messiah?

A Broken Question

The question is contains two non sequiturs. The correct answer to the question is, “The question is not a valid question.”

First, I’d like to know the count of fulfilled and unfulfilled prophecies and how it was arrived at. Bear in mind that many prophecies were in the form of typology.

For example, Moses prophesied that the Messiah would be like him. Both Jesus and Moses were rejected by their people. Both, after presenting themselves to their people, when away for a very long time before a second appearance. Both delivered Law: the first, a Law that condemns, and the second, a Law that liberates. Both presented sacrifices: the first, covering sacrifices, and the second, a redeeming sacrifice. I haven’t even scratched the surface here; Moses’ life was rich with prophetic symbolism. And that’s just one of many prophets.

Second, saying the prophecies concerning Messiah were not fulfilled is like writing a review for a play before the second act has even started or calling a baseball game after only the second inning. During Messiah Jesus’s first appearing, He accomplished a redemptive sacrifice that is there, plain as day, throughout the Old Testament, yet none of the Old Testament Jews anticipated. They focused entirely on nationalistic, political events yet to unfold, to the exclusion of predecessor, spiritual events. As Jesus said to Peter, “you are not mindful of the things of God, but the things of men.” (Matthew 16:23, NKJV).

Why Believe?

Why anyone should accept Jesus as the Messiah remains a valid question, even if a gross misunderstanding of the prophecies motivates it. There are other answers, perhaps better answers, but this answer fits the context of the question. To understand it, some context is needed.

In the Bible, redemption, adoption, and sanctification all have two phases. These differences are gleaned from how the words are used in their contexts and from customs of ancient Jewish, Hellenist (Greek culture), and Roman societies.

• Redemption first involves the payment that transfers ownership and then involves taking delivery of the thing purchased.
• Adoption involves a legal declaration that makes someone a legal heir and then involves the execution of the will; which means for Christians the resurrection or transformation of the body leading into Judgment Day.
• Sanctification involves a legal declaration that makes someone holy and righteous, based on Messiah’s already having paid sin’s debt, followed by a gradual process of transforming that person’s behaviors into righteousness.
• Redemption, adoption, and sanctification converge when Messiah returns, wherein Messiah takes to Himself the believers remaining on earth, and transforming them into holy perfection, no longer in a form that is subject to temptation, and worthy to enter God’s presence.

As you can see, the phased processes (along with too many other processes and goals to mention here) dovetail with the concept of two appearance. That brings us to the answer to the question. First, one should believe because Jesus did fulfill so many prophecies. Second, one should believe, and believe now, because the delay in fulfillment of the remaining prophecies means there’s still time to find redemption. When Messiah fulfills the rest of the prophecies, it will be too late.

Tank

I remember a troubled young man Tank. After believing, he thought about questions he’d never considered before. One question above all bothered him: Why hasn’t God stopped sin and punished the wicked? How can God allow it to go on?

I asked when he had become a believer. Tank answered, two weeks ago.

Then I asked him, “Two weeks. Suppose Jesus had come three weeks weeks ago, stopped sin, and judged all the wicked for their sins. Where would Tank be now?”

Tank thought about it. “I guess, instead of asking why God allows sin to go on, I should thank Him for giving me more time, shouldn’t I?”

The delay between the first and second appearances of Messiah Jesus allows time for more people to repent and their place faith in Messiah. It allows them time to grow in holiness, worship God, and demonstrate His power. It also allows others to add to the accountability that will enable God to demonstrate His justice and holiness. You don’t want to be in the group that thinks the yet-to-be-fulfilled prophecies comprise a valid rationalization for rejecting the redemption the Messiah offers.

Copyright 2020, Richard Wheeler. Most of this question was originally posted on Quora. Permission granted for personal and non-profit use, and please give credit where credit is due.

Unrealistic Expectations and Hypocrites in the Church

Excuses

An atheist protests, most so-called Christians don’t believe the Bible, don’t follow it, don’t believe what Christ said and live lives directly contrary to it. Real Christians agree!

The gospel according to a counterfeit Christian can be damning. The way they discredit the truth in the minds of unbelievers is an obstacle to conversion, and the way they distort the gospel leaves converts no closer to God than they were as Atheists. Plus, the way counterfeits discredit the gospel places a burden to those who do believe and live out the scriptures.

However, the Atheist's argument is not logical. The proliferation of counterfeits does not disprove that the real thing exists. To the contrary, it can indicate that something of real value exists and is worth counterfeiting.

Unrealistic Expectations

I need to say something about unrealistic expectations. Entering the biblical Christian faith requires understanding that you’re not good. Gaining understanding of the faith and its requirements takes time. Living the faith requires growth. One does not simply transform from decades-old habits and personality patterns overnight. Regardless of your chronological age, believers start out as spiritual babies when converted. They don’t start out worthy of being canonized as saints. 

So when a person criticizes a Christian for not being perfect, it’s like criticizing a student at some random point in his education for not having all the scholarship of a researcher who earned his PhD decades ago. There’s a point where criticizing the “hypocrites in the church” becomes an absurd excuse for not seriously considering the faith itself.

Copyright 2020, Richard Wheeler. Permission granted for personal or non-profit use, but please give credit where credit is due.

Was Matthias the Twelfth Apostle?

Was Matthias, or Paul, the twelfth apostle?

The apostles cast lots in Acts 1:24-26 to know who should replace Judas. The lot fell to Matthias.

Was this sanctioned by the Lord? Does Proverbs 16:33 endorse it?

First, understand that it does not matter. It does not affect the gospel. It will not affect how we live. However, I’ll spell out my reasons for disagreement with those who say God chose Matthias because there might be something to learn hermeneutically.

1. Most of the proverbs are generalities, not universal promises. I won’t argue this point myself. Instead, I’ll direct you to any parent who reared their child in the love, nurture, and admonition of the Lord, yet that child went permanently astray. Citing Proverbs 16:33 is an extremely weak argument because the literary style of Proverbs prohibits turning 16:33 into a universal endorsement of casting lots. It is also weak because there's no evidence that the disciples should have been casting lots in the first place.
   
   
2. Description of an event does not imply endorsement or prescription. Many bad interpretations of the Bible come from taking the description of an event to indicate its endorsement. Atheists commonly take Old Testament descriptions of murders, rapes, and child sacrifices to mean that God endorses such abominations. But the Bible describes people honestly warts and all. Acts in no way endorses the selection of Matthias as an apostle; it merely documents it.
   
   
3. Jesus told the disciples to chill until the Holy Spirit came. During the time between Jesus ascension into heaven and Pentecost, the disciples should have been waiting, not taking action. Impetuous Peter impulsively perpetrated a violation of that command. God’s choice was Paul, and that choice came later, in God’s timing.
   
   For an Old Testament analogue, recall how Jesse presented all the sons he thought would be qualified to be anointed by the prophet (1 Samuel 16). The prophet had to urge Jesse to present the son he hadn’t thought of, and that son, David, turned out to be God’s choice. Likewise, the disciples set their own criteria for selection and then forced a choice from among their own personal favorites.
   
   
4. There’s no evidence that when they cast lots, they gave God the option of “None of the above.” They forced a selection of a replacement.
   
   
5. When Paul said in his church epistles that he was chosen by God, not by men, it was a dig at the false apostles who were misleading the churches. I would speculate that the net also caught the Eleven’s forcing a premature choice.
   
   
6. Matthias, once chosen, rarely, if ever, appears again in the New Testament. He is not know for any great accomplishment.

Arguments 5 and 6 are very weak arguments, but I think that the arguments, taken together, form a very strong case that the twelfth apostle was Paul, not Matthias. 

Copyright 2020, Richard Wheeler. This is a significantly edited version of a comment first posted on Quora. Permission granted for non-profit use provided credit is given where credit is due.

Define Deliverance

What is deliverance according to the Bible?

Deliverance means protection or rescue from danger. The more interesting questions are:

• From what things are people delivered?
• Who delivers?
• Who is delivered?
• How does (whom?) deliver?

When you consider all the possible answers to those questions, you can see that deliverance can have a great number of meanings.

Here are some examples from the Bible. Note: A word in the original Hebrew or Greek manuscripts can have more than one translation or interpretation in English, so different Bible translations may use other words.

• No king is saved by his vast army; no warrior is delivered by his great strength. A horse is a vain hope for deliverance; even its great strength cannot save. Psalm 33:16–17.
  
  The word deliverance in this passage has a wide meaning. It could be translated deliverance, help, salvation, or victory. The passage emphasizes reliance on God instead of on physical means. It continues:
  
  Behold, the eye of the LORD is on those who fear Him,
  On those who hope for His lovingkindness,
  To deliver their soul from death
  And to keep them alive in famine.
  Our soul waits for the LORD;
  He is our help and our shield.
• You are my hiding place; You preserve me from trouble; You surround me with songs of deliverance. Psalm 32:7.
  
  God protected the prophet, King David, from many attempts on his life both before and after he became king of Israel. God usually did this by providing a way of escape for David.
• For if you remain silent at this time, relief and deliverance for the Jews will arise from another place, but you and your father’s house will perish. And who knows but that you have come to the kingdom for such a time as this? Esther 4:14
  
  Israel had been conquered by Babylon. A politician had tricked the king into killing them. God was using Esther’s cousin/adopted father to talk her into appealing to the king in order to rescue their people from the plot.
• But on Mount Zion there will be deliverance, and it will be holy, and the house of Jacob will reclaim their possession. Obadiah 1:17
  
  This was part of a prophecy that had a very broad meaning. It predicted that God would provide a means of rescue and protection from the destruction of the wicked on Judgment Day. It implies physical protection of both faithful descendants of Abraham and faithful non-Jews, as well as redemption of faithful people from damnation.

In the New Testament, the word deliverance is replaced by more specific words such as salvation and redemption. The word deliver is used, but usually in a negative sense wherein one person turns a second person over to an authority for punishment. That includes (a) betrayers or low-level authorities turning a believer over to authorities for persecution and (b) a spiritual leader turning a badly sinning Christian over to the devil for punishment. The second sense happened when false preachers blasphemed and when a Christian took his father’s wife as his own.

Some churches use the term deliverance to means that God rescues someone from an addiction, disease, or demon, possibly using healing of the body or the emotions. Many of those churches cross the line into fanatical. The deliverance is almost always psychological, not miraculous. However, it would be just as wrong to say that God never does such deliverance.

In other churches, deliverance may mean that God rescues someone from the penalty of sin. This is normally called salvation. Near-synonyms that emphasize how it happens include redemption and the new birth (born again). Spiritual deliverance is far more important than types that only benefit us in our short, earthly lives. As Jesus said, “What does it profit a man if he gain the whole world and lose his own soul?” God does this by by granting an awareness of one’s condemnation and then granting trust in His promise to apply the price that He paid through Christ’s sacrifice on the cross, with the physical resurrection of Christ being the proof that God does what He promises.

I first posted this on Quora at https://www.quora.com/unanswered/What-is-deliverance-according-to-the-Bible. I trust anyone who copies it to give credit where credit is due.